Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Primary care rehabilitation after Knee Replacement – a cross sectional study

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Contributors:
      Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Human Movement: health and rehabilitation, Lunds universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper, Människan i rörelse: hälsa och rehabilitering, Originator; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Lunds universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper, Originator; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Sport Sciences, Lunds universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper, Idrottsvetenskap, Originator
    • Abstract:
      Background: Rehabilitation after Knee Replacement (KR) surgery often entails an extensive rehabilitation in primary care but evidence-based high-quality guidelines are lacking. There is also a knowledge gap regarding current rehabilitation modalities applied in primary care in Sweden. This study aimed to (I) describe rehabilitation in primary care after KR and (II) explore phys-iotherapists’ perceptions of patients’ challenges during the rehabilitation. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among Swedish physiotherapists working in primary care. Questions were categorical or open-ended and related to current rehabilitation practices, treatment modalities, and physiothera-pists’ perceptions of patients’ challenges in rehabilitation after KR. Data were described descriptively and open-ended answers were analyzed with quantitative and qualitative content analysis. Results: In total, 202 physiotherapists answered the survey. Rehabilitation focused on home exercises with recurrent physiotherapy visits. Common treatment modalities were knee range of motion exercises, strength training, and stationary cycling. Key rehabilitation challenges included the following categories: Patients are unprepared, Challenging to find the optimal load, and Restoring function and trust in the knee. Conclusion: Rehabilitation after KR in Swedish primary care seems to be in line with previously recommended international treatment modalities. According to the physiotherapists in this study, some of the key challenges that patients faced were not being prepared for the severe pain regaining function and trust in the knee, balancing load/recovery, and resuming physically demanding activities.