A213 ERCP-RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS IN PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW & META-ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Although the complications of ERCP are well known in the general population, there is conflicting data regarding complications in patients with PSC. Factors that predict ERCP-related adverse events in PSC are also unclear. AIMS: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses to 1. compare ERCP-related adverse events in patients with and without PSC and 2. determine risk factors associated with ERCP-related adverse events in PSC. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Embase, PubMed and CENTRAL for studies published from January 1, 2000 to May 12, 2021. Eligible studies included adults with PSC undergoing ERCP and reported at least one ERCP-related adverse event (bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis, cholangitis) or risk factor associated with complications. Raw event rates for adverse events and risk factors were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) which were then pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: Four studies contributed to the first meta-analysis. There was a significant three-fold increase in the 30-day odds of cholangitis in PSC compared to those without PSC (4.3% vs. 2.0%; OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.08–9.90; p=0.037; I(2)=73.0%) (Figure 1). However, there were no significant differences in 30-day pancreatitis (4.2% vs. 3.4%; OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.26–3.07; p=0.851; I(2)=87.9%), bleeding (0.3% vs. 1.1%; OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.06–2.21; p=0.272; I(2)=50.3%), or perforation (0.7% vs. 0.5%; OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.40–3.51; p=0.752; I(2)=28.5%). In a second meta-analysis, risk factors contributing to post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in PSC were pooled from five studies. While female sex was not associated with PEP, accidental passage of wire into the pancreatic duct (OR 7.44, 95% CI 3.33–16.65; p<0.001; I(2)=65.0%) and biliary sphincterotomy (OR 4.80, 95% CI 1.92–12.03; p=0.001; I(2)=73.1%) were associated with higher PEP odds. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of limited ...