Maktaba

Item request has been placed!

Item request cannot be made.

Processing Request

Academic Journal

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.

Authors : Gargon E; Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.; Gorst SL

Subjects: Comparative Effectiveness Research*/Comparative Effectiveness Research*/Comparative Effectiveness Research*/statistics & numerical data ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care*/Outcome Assessment, Health Care*/Outcome Assessment, Health Care*/statistics & numerical data; Publications/Publications/Publications/statistics & numerical data

Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2019 Dec 12; Vol. 14 (12), pp. e0225980. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 12 (Print Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Academic Journal

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.

Authors : Gargon E; MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.; Gorst SL

Subjects: Comparative Effectiveness Research*/Comparative Effectiveness Research*/Comparative Effectiveness Research*/methods ; Comparative Effectiveness Research*/Comparative Effectiveness Research*/Comparative Effectiveness Research*/standards ; Comparative Effectiveness Research*/Comparative Effectiveness Research*/Comparative Effectiveness Research*/trends

Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2018 Dec 28; Vol. 13 (12), pp. e0209869. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Dec 28 (Print Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Academic Journal

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.

Authors : Davis K; MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.; Gorst SL

Subjects: Comparative Effectiveness Research/Comparative Effectiveness Research/Comparative Effectiveness Research/*methods ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care/Outcome Assessment, Health Care/Outcome Assessment, Health Care/*methods; Comparative Effectiveness Research/Comparative Effectiveness Research/Comparative Effectiveness Research/trends

Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2018 Feb 13; Vol. 13 (2), pp. e0190695. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Feb 13 (Print Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Academic Journal

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.

Authors : Gargon E; Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.; Gorst SL

Subjects: Health*; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Humans

Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2021 Jan 12; Vol. 16 (1), pp. e0244878. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 12 (Print Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Academic Journal

Propensity score estimation to address calendar time-specific channeling in comparative effectiveness research of second generation antipsychotics.

Authors : Dusetzina SB; Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America. ; Mack CD

Subjects: Comparative Effectiveness Research* ; Propensity Score*; Antipsychotic Agents/Antipsychotic Agents/Antipsychotic Agents/*pharmacology

Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2013 May 07; Vol. 8 (5), pp. e63973. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 May 07 (Print Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: Electronic-Print Cited Medium: Internet

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Academic Journal

Cost-effectiveness of broadly neutralizing antibodies for HIV prophylaxis for infants born in settings with high HIV burdens

Authors : Alba, Christopher; Malhotra, Shelly; Horsfall, Stephanie

Subjects: 3207 Medical Microbiology (for-2020); 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (for-2020); Clinical Research (rcdc)

Source: PLOS ONE. 20(3)

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Academic Journal

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.

Authors : Gorst SL; MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research (NWHTMR), Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.; Gargon E

Subjects: Outcome Assessment, Health Care*; Comparative Effectiveness Research/Comparative Effectiveness Research/Comparative Effectiveness Research/*methods ; Databases, Factual/Databases, Factual/Databases, Factual/*statistics & numerical data

Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2016 Dec 14; Vol. 11 (12), pp. e0168403. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Dec 14 (Print Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Academic Journal

Comparative effectiveness research: an empirical study of trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors : Bourgeois FT; Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. ; Murthy S

Subjects: Clinical Trials as Topic*/Clinical Trials as Topic*/Clinical Trials as Topic*/economics ; Empirical Research* ; Internet*

Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2012; Vol. 7 (1), pp. e28820. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Jan 09.Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Academic Journal

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.

Authors : Gorst SL; Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.; Gargon E

Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2016 Jan 19; Vol. 11 (1), pp. e0146444. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jan 19 (Print Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Academic Journal

How well do randomized trials inform decision making: systematic review using comparative effectiveness research measures on acupuncture for back pain.

Authors : Witt CM; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Center for Integrative Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America. ; Manheimer E

Subjects: Acupuncture Therapy/Acupuncture Therapy/Acupuncture Therapy/*methods ; Back Pain/Back Pain/Back Pain/*therapy; Comparative Effectiveness Research

Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2012; Vol. 7 (2), pp. e32399. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Feb 28.Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet

Record details

Read Online Read More Add to Saved list

Search Results

Your Filters

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.

Propensity score estimation to address calendar time-specific channeling in comparative effectiveness research of second generation antipsychotics.

Cost-effectiveness of broadly neutralizing antibodies for HIV prophylaxis for infants born in settings with high HIV burdens

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.

Comparative effectiveness research: an empirical study of trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.

How well do randomized trials inform decision making: systematic review using comparative effectiveness research measures on acupuncture for back pain.

Contact

Follow us